Pigskin Paul Peruses Packers Picks

ALLGBP.com All Green Bay Packers All the Time

Packers NFL draft picksSo now all the guess work is over and the NFL Draft is in the books. As I write this most Packers rookies are showing up for their first taste of an NFL OTA.

And it is obvious that unless I am going to be totally oblivious of my readers’ desires, which is not a good thing at all, I am going to have to relent of my “no Draft Grades” stance, at least relative to the PACKERS and the rest of the NFC North.

So let’s start right at the top of the list with the team that is the clear choice as “America’s Team”, to the vast majority of my readers.



ROUND 1, PICK 26        DATONE JONES        6’4/283        UCLA        4.80/40    32 3/4” ARMS    10” HANDS

JONES selection may have been a slight surprise to some, but his name had been surfacing in talk of the PACK’s Draft plan on a regular basis over the final weeks leading up to the Draft.  The team’s brain trust (THOMPSON&McCARTHY) clearly agreed in principle with a lot of the PACKERS fan base that the team needed more help for CLAY MATTHEWS in generating pressure on opposing QBs. Disrupting opposing backfields turned into a hobby for JONES last season under the new coaching staff at UCLA, led by veteran NFL Coach JIM MORA. He recorded 19 TFL and 6.5 Sacks in his final season for the BRUINS. He might be a bit light in the pants for an NFL 3-4 scheme, but he carries his current weight well and combines functional strength and quickness to keep from being engulfed by bigger OT. His 29 reps in the Bench Press at the COMBINE was impressive for his weight. He also shows solid hand work combining strength and quickness to keep blockers off balance. He had a very solid week of work in Mobile at the Senior Bowl. He excelled in practices and roamed the field effectively during the game. One would expect that DOM CAPERS will move JONES around and have him on the field even in his 2-man DL formations. He has experience all along the line and has more athleticism than the last guy the PACKERS selected to fill this role for them: MIKE NEAL. I would expect JONES and a healthy NICK PERRY to help CLAY MATTHEWS tremendously in the front 7 in 2013. Not a “special” player like MATTHEWS, but appears to be an excellent fit in the PACKERS schemes and should contribute right away as a Rookie.

Ranked 52nd overall in Pigskin Paul’s final prospect rankings.


ROUND 2, PICK 61        EDDIE LACY/RB    5’11/231    ALABAMA    4.60/40     31” ARMS     9.5” HANDS

There was no doubt that LACY was the top RB coming out of college football this year, but a lengthy list of medical issues as documented in his medical exams led to his being available for the PACK in Round 2. So the big question becomes how well the team’s medical staff was able to diagnose his past & current injury issues and project them going forward in a pro career. Despite the fact that with McCARTHY as the HC and AARON RODGERS at QB, this team is going to live and die by the passing game, an awful lot of people think this team clearly needs to be able to run the ball more effectively to win more Play-Off games and capture another LOMBARDI Trophy while their current roster is in its prime. When healthy LACY is a dominating power runner, with surprising quickness and field vision. In his three years at ‘BAMA he compiled a 6.8 ypc career mark, which also included 30 rushing TD. His determination and burst through the creases created by his OL, and the ability to bounce off would-be tacklers is reminiscent of MARSHAWN LYNCH. Although only asked to catch out of the backfield on a limited basis, he appears to have good hands. He also shows the desire and ability to pass-pro, which has been a missing quality in too many recent PACKERS RB candidates. Protecting RODGERS better is a big deal and that will require more than just better OL play. In the NFL RB pass-pro is essential. In essence I’m describing a RB who should significantly upgrade the PACKERS running game, which many fans have clamored for since TED THOMPSON took over the team. The medical issues may be a risk, but without them the PACK never would have gotten a sniff of this guy in Round 2. If he can stay healthy and get 20 touches per game the PACKERS running attack will improve tremendously with another 1,000 yard RB.

Ranked 27th overall by Pigskin Paul.


TRADER TED put on his cape and wheeled and dealed his way out of Round 3, leaving himself with a bevy of extra Picks for Saturday, where traditionally he has done some of his best prospect evaluation and picking. So let’s move on to Round 4, where THOMPSON ended up with 3 Picks.


ROUND 4, PICK 109    DAVID BAKHTIARI/OT    6’4/299    COLORADO    5.09/40    34” ARMS    9.5” HANDS

Once again the specter of too many hits on RODGERS prompted THOMPSON to switch his emphasis into the trenches. BAKHTIARI toiled in relative obscurity at one of the worst D1 college football programs in the country, in recent years. He opted to leave school early rather than face another new coaching staff this Fall. He started all three years at Colorado. Despite being the long-armed, lanky zone blocking type of player the PACKERS covet he is strong for his frame, with a solid hand punch and an impressive 28 reps at the COMBINE. He’s a natural knee bender and should be able to keep up with the faster speed pass rushers around the League. My guess would be that he’ll be a weight room project to improve his core strength. Word right now is that he will open Training Camp competing at the LT spot with BRIAN BULAGA. I’d bet dollars to donuts that the team would love for this guy to shine right away and allow them to move BULAGA back to RT.  I doubt they are counting on that scenario, but I’m sure they see him as their LT f the future.

Pigskin Paul had him ranked as the 124th best prospect in the DRAFT.


ROUND 4, PICK 122    J.C. TRETTER/OG/OC    6’4/307    CORNELL    5.09/40    33 3/8” ARMS    10 3/8” HANDS

I had been touting TRETTER for the PACK ever since the COMBINE.  Evidently THOMPSON saw even more in him than I did, taking him this early. But there is no denying the athleticism and potential of this Ivy Leaguer who started at  LT his last 2 years there. He looks to have the frame to add another 10 lbs. easily as part of the proposed switch to the interior OL. He will represent the kind of athletic, but strong interior OL they like. He could also have great value early in his career with his ability to likely back up all 5 OL slots. He pressed the bar 29 times at the COMBINE, which is well above average for his weight and arm length. I am not going to quibble that he was taken to early. He has NFL starting potential and that justifies being picked in the top 150.

He was ranked as the 196th best prospect by Pigskin Paul.


ROUND 4, PICK 125        JOHNATHAN FRANKLIN/RB    5’10/205    UCLA    4.49/40    30” ARMS    9 3/8” HANDS

I’m thinking an awful lot of PACKERS fans were downright stunned that WHITEY would take another RB with this Pick. Even more of us were stunned that this player was still on the Draft Board beyond Friday’s selections. I have been wondering for almost a year where the love was for FRANKLIN given his career’s work at UCLA. Like JONES he absolutely thrived under the MORA coaching regime. He left UCLA as their all-time leading rusher with over 4,400 hundred yards and a career average of 5.6 ypc. He showed excellent hands as a senior  when they looked for him in the passing game and hauled in 33 catches. Coach MORA was effusive in praise of him both as a person and a player, which is always music to the ears of TED THOMPSON. His early career fumbling problems disappeared under the MORA staff, with only 1 fumble in 315 touches last season. He too, MR. RODGERS, is solid in pass-pro for his size. I would expect he might get a chance to return kick-offs in Green Bay. Based on the praise from his college coaches also expect him to be a leader on Special Teams if asked to work there. He has shown the ability to get to the corner and take it to the end zone with incredible upfield burst.

Pigskin Paul had him ranked all the way up at the 85th overall slot.


ROUND 5, PICK 159            MICAH HYDE/CB    6’0/196    IOWA    4.56/40        31 1/2” ARMS    9 3/8” HANDS

At this point in the Draft IOWA players become popular because under a FERENTZ coaching staff they learn a lot of NFL principles of play and technique. HYDE, assuming he gets past an upcoming court date unscathed, can play any slot in the secondary with his only real question mark being deep cover/catch-up speed. But like FLETCHER & SPIEVEY before him, he’s likely to be a valuable 6th DB who can play either S or CB in a pinch or a sub-package. He’s also likely to find some key roles on PACKERS Special Teams. He’s not likely to ever be an NFL starter, but his versatility could improve the bottom half of their roster and from this point on in a Draft that is the most you can expect.

He was ranked as the 182nd best prospect by Pigskin Paul.


ROUND 5, PICK 167        JOSH BOYD/DL    6’3/310    MISSISSIPPI ST    5.14/40    32” ARMS    10” HANDS

A really productive, work/try-hard player with more talent than it looks like at first blush. He would seem to have scheme diversity for the PACKERS D. That would seem especially true when the team goes to its 2-man DL scheme. He may not catch the opposing QB very often, but he will chase until the whistle blows or until taken off the field. Had a more than respectable 32 reps in the bench press at the COMBINE. He might have room to improve his overall game some under the coaching at the NFL level, and the help of a solid weight and strength training regimen. With the majority of the PACKERS veteran DL in the final year of their contracts BOYD has a great opportunity to prove to the coaching staff that there is no need to re-up some of those journeymen vets. I like his NFL potential.

He was ranked by Pigskin Paul as the 172nd best prospect in this Draft.

ROUND 6, PICK 193        NATE PALMER/OLB    6’2/233    ILLINOIS STATE    4.85/40

Just the kind of small school, highly athletic, conversion project you should expect from TED THOMPSON by the time you get to Round 6. He’s a well built, athletic player who showed a knack for pressuring the QB with his hand in the dirt. The PACK  scouts must have had a great scouting visit the Redbirds campus last Fall since they signed two other players as URFA. One would expect a year on the Practice Squad unless he shows too much in pre-season to escape a waiver claim by another alert NFL team. f they can hide him and coach him up, he might be able to contribute on the playing field from scrimmage after an apprenticeship on Special Teams.

Not ranked in Pigskin Paul’s Top 300, but listed as an unranked prospect.


ROUND 7, PICK 216        CHARLES JOHNSON/WR    6’2/215    GRAND VALLEY ST   4.40/40

It took a while, but it seemed pretty logical that the PACK would add a WR or two given the number of Picks they had, and the loss of DRIVER/JENNINGS. JOHNSON had some post-HS off-field issues but landed at small school power Grand Valley two years ago and kept his nose clean off the field. He was a production machine with 128 catches and 31 TD in two seasons. He got some attention after his Pro Day when he ran a reported sub-4.00/40. Such times are quite often highly suspicious, but suffice it to say that a guy his size motoring in the 4.40 range is impressive. He’s the kind of physical specimen/project that WHITEY likes to present to his coaches and let the teaching begin. His most obvious value at  is size could be as a Red Zone weapon. RODGERS should have no problem spotting him in a crowd. Good upside Pick in Round 7.

Pigskin Paul had him ranked as the 263rd best prospect overall.


ROUND 7, PICK 224        KEVIN DORSEY/WR        6’2/210    MARYLAND    4.47/40

It’s hard to get a recent read on DORSEY’s ability since MARYLAND has had such a huge upheaval since Randy Edsall took over the program two seasons ago. DORSEY had a constant parade of new QB throwing the ball to him, on the rare occasions that the team wasn’t running the option Offense. But the team had him in Green Bay for a workout and visit. Suffice it to say they saw something they liked and decided to nab him here. He might surprise, or he could just be Training Camp fodder in a numbers game. But at the least he would seem like a solid candidate to land on their Practice Squad for further development.

Pigskin Paul did not have DORSEY ranked but did have him on his prospect list.


ROUND 7, PICK 232        SAM BARRINGTON/ILB    6’1/246    SOUTH FLORIDA    4.91/40

BARRINGTON was a very productive and versatile performer for SKIP HOLTZ at USF. A bit undersized for today’s NFL, he nonetheless could bring value to the team as a Special Teamer initially. Another player who I suspect will end up on their Practice Squad unless injuries at LB force their hand to retain him on the roster. Things will still boil down to how much he impresses with his Special Teams play if he is to have any chance to stick. Nothing is a reach this late in the Draft, but I don’t see anything special that he adds to their roster right now.

Not ranked by Pigskin Paul but included in his prospect list.


This was an interesting DRAFT and most likely a productive one for the PACK. There is a good mix of  need-picks and value-picks in the mix here. Even though TED did not/could not trade out of Round 1, he did work the Draft and got himself up from 8 Picks up to 11. As I stated many times this Spring the value in this Draft was quality depth, not elite players. Thus, getting an extra 3 Picks allowed the team to add some quality volume and help increase Training Camp competition. I would also point out that it appears that WHITEY did indeed make a conscious effort to increase team speed, athleticism and strength with this Draft Class. It’s doubtful the team under THOMPSON will ever be confused with the Monsters of the Midway of days gone by, but I do believe the organization does want to ramp things up a bit to match-up better with the more physical rosters than annually seem to advance furthest in the Play-Offs.

A very solid and creative Draft effort that I think rates a B+ grade.


Note: You can read more from Paul on the Packers and the NFL Draft on his website, Pigskin Paul’s Place.

26 thoughts on “Pigskin Paul Peruses Packers Picks

  1. Great stuff, Paul. I don’t read much prospect analysis, but I always read yours. Keep up the good work.

  2. “As I stated many times this Spring the value in this Draft was quality depth, not elite players.”

    In your expert opinion, is that why we see so many discrepancies between the pre-draft rankings and the actual picks? In regard to your board, some of these players went much higher, while some went much lower.

    1. Hey Chad. I will qioute the Bard of the Avon, even tho he ddin’t have the NFL Draft in mind, when He wrote” Every eye forms it’s own beauty.” OPinions on most players are all over the place. Being on target and off base is part of the fun of being a Draftnik. Usually, we all look smart or gnorant depending upon which Pick and which ranking you choose to look at. Not much difference between many of these players on paper or film.
      Pigskin Paul

  3. I was really impressed with Datone Jones at the combine. He has such sharp movements for a man of his size. I sense greatness in this one.

  4. it is hard not to see cullen jenkins in a lot of what datone jones does. david bakhtiari could be the guy that we look back on in a couple of years and say he was the best pick of the draft. he will definitely compete for a tackle spot next year if not this year and paul stated. he has all the tools that you look for. and i agree his main weakness at this point is he needs to get stronger. but that will come. he is young.

    1. I think Bakhtiari is an OG by the end of training camp. I don’t see OT in his future.

    2. My evaluation of Bakhtiari for the CHTV draft guide was a feeling that he should have stayed in school for one more year. I think in 2 years he will be a solid player, whether at tackle or guard.

  5. This draft probably won’t get its grade from the first two picks. I expect that they will live up to expectations. It is the later round guys that will send us over the top. If one of the O-linemen pan out and one of our 7th round receivers make a splash then we will look back to this draft as one of the best

    1. “This draft probably won’t get its grade from the first two picks. I expect that they will live up to expectations”

      That would be an A/B in most books regardless of what happens in the lower rounds.

  6. I like this draft, Many have wondered why a Safety was not drafted, I was not in that boat, None of the safeties have the type of physical ability of McMillian and the Packers have two, IMO of the best DB coaches in the NFL.
    The first two picks are very talented and fit needs of the Packers.
    I like both Olinemen, Boyd realy does fit the Packers use of the Dlinemen quite well.
    My two Favorite picks are Nate Palmer and Charles Johnson.
    Nate Palmer will be on the field this year,As a back up an on special teams. He has experience both with his hand on the ground and standing up.
    When you look at the OLB group Palmer, Moses are the highest chance to be the back up OLBs behind Matthews and Perry.
    And remember this name Mulumba, he is another College DE that will make the conversion to OLB in the 3-4.


    Don’t discount Johnson because he was a 7th rounder, the Packers have not had a WR with that kind of physical skills since Javon Walker.
    Johnson is further ahead in route running then Walker was coming out of college. HIGHLY productive. There is not one other WR behind Jones, Nelson, Cobb on the roster that can do the things Johnson can.

    And watch the safety from Illinois State also, He is a converted WR, who got it this last year with 7 int’s,excellent athlete.


    1. Just read a tweet from GBPG staff that the ISU kid didn’t pass his physical. Doesn’t look like he will be joining the club. Would like to see confirmation, thought.

  7. So much for TT’s mantra of selecting the BPA.

    With the exceptions of Lacy and Franklin, all of the Packers’ picks were either unranked or ranked lower than their actual selection position by Pigskin Paul. Drafttek’s ratings are more generous, finding a positive value of 19 in the selection of Bakhtiari as pick #109 (in other words, Drafttek ranked Bakhtiari the 90th best prospect) and a positive value of 3 in Jones’s selection at #26 (Sorry Pigskin Paul, but Minnesota had pick #25, not GB). Interestingly, Drafttek finds Tretter’s selection as pick #122 a minus 70 in value and Palmer’s selection at #193 a whopping minus 262. So in Palmer’s case, Drafttek thought there were 262 other better players available.

    Of course, none of our draft selections have played a down yet in the NFL, so it is far too early to criticize TT’s picks. From Drafttek’s rankings, though, the “steal” of the draft appears to have been Philadelphia’s selection of Jordan Poyer with pick #218, a value of plus 173. Other noteworthy “value” selections that TT missed include: Jesse Williams (a plus 111 selection by Seattle with pick #137); David Quessenberry (a plus 83 selection by Houston with pick #176); Baccari Rambo (a plus 96 selection by Washington with pick #191); Tavarres King (a plus 52 selection by the Broncos with pick #161); and, Quinton Patton (a plus 67 selection by the 49ers with pick #128). On paper at least, just imagine what a draft that would have been if TT had selected these “value” picks in addition to Jones, Lacy, Bakhtiari and Franklin!

    1. “all of the Packers’ picks were either unranked or ranked lower than their actual selection position…”

      All player rankings are subjective. Every team, hell, probably every single scout, much less every single media source, has a different rating, ranking, or grade for the players in the NFL.

      Therefore, the only thing that you can judge BPA value upon would be the Packers’ final big board.. Something nobody outside of the Packers’ front office/scouting dept. will ever get a glimpse of.

      If you are suggesting that the Packers willfully selected players that they deemed inferior to other players still available at any given slotting, well, I would just cut my losses and quit being a Packers fan at that point. Why follow a team you believe is going out of its way to be less competitive than they are capable of being?

      1. Lighten-up, Oppy! As Pigskin Paul quoted Shakespeare, “Every eye forms its own beauty.” That is, indeed, part of the fun of being a “draftnik.” I do find the Drafttek ranking system quite objective, though. Check out its website and read about its methodology.

        Obviously, there are reasons why a player may be picked lower than his player ranking and vice versa. For example, Lacy was picked at position #61, even though Drafttek ranked him the 40th best player overall. That “slide” may have occurred because GMs were concerned about his injury history, or they simply didn’t need a RB or had more pressing needs. There are many possible reasons for his fall down the draftboard, but no one can dispute that the Packers got “good value” in selecting him at #61 despite the health risks. Similarly, Seattle’s selection of Jesse Williams at pick #137 was “good value” and probably carries less of a risk.

        Speaking of “good value,” I forgot to include in my earlier post Cincinnati’s selection of LOT Reid Fragel(one of my favorite players by-the-way and one I had hoped the Packers would select) with pick #240. Drafttek had ranked him as the 111th best player overall.

        1. I think you are missing my point.

          Value is completely arbitrary. Since every team assesses and grades each player differently, “value” is completely in the eye of the beholder.

          Let’s say Draftbrats.com has slotted player “A” as the 17th best player in the draft. But the Packers research and scouting has them placing a value on that player as the 174th best player in the draft. Packers select player “A” with the 168th overall pick.

          You say the Packers got the best value pick in the draft, scooping up Player “A” a whopping 151 spots lower than Draftbrats.com had him rated. The Packers front office feels like they got player “A” right about where they thought he belonged. Maybe the Cowboys had Player “A” ranked as undraftable- they’re laughing at the Packers horrible selection.

          Which is it? It’s all subjective (until the players play, of course.) When people start talking about how the Packers screwed the pooch on a pick because there were “better value players” still left on the board, they’re talking about purely subjective player ratings that might have little to do with the PAckers’ own board. I don’t think the Packers or any other NFL team give two hoots how Drafttek or any other draft site, news outlet, etc rank the players and line up their boards. They are making their decisions based on their data, not the data of Draftek, Pigskin Paul, CBS sports, or anyone else.

          1. When the Great God Ted Thompson says he selects “the best player available,” all the “homers” out there just bow and say, “Amen,” even though an objective rating source ranks 262 other players better.

            1. When the great god (insert draftnik website name here) says so and so is better than so and so, all the “draftniks” out there just bow and say, “Amen,” even though they are just a bunch of guys who like to play football experts, as opposed to an entire staff of NFL professional scouts and talent evaluators who are paid top dollar to thoroughly investigate all college talent in a particular region of the country year around and write detailed reports on them…

              Look, the bottom line is, even the professionals will tell you drafting isn’t an exact science. There are hits and misses, all the time. You don’t know till they play. All I was trying to do was have an intelligent discussion about the realities of declaring any player a “value” or the “best player available” (or not) because it is completely subjective and every team is going to follow their own board when it comes down to making those decisions.

              Apparently, you aren’t interested in having an intelligent conversation about it. It’s either I agree with you, or I’m a mindless homer. Oh well. So be it.

              1. Picking “the best player available” is Ted Thompson’s mantra. Those are his words.

                If a GM selected QB James Vandenberg when he could have selected Gino Smith and then said that he picked “the best player available,” one would have to question that GM’s judgment. Although the draft has many subjective elements and is dependent upon each team’s needs, there are objective standards in evaluating talent. One could say, for example, that Vandenberg is as good of a QB as Smith, but one would hard pressed to objectively back-up that statement.

                In my opinion,TT made several very good selections in this draft and showed fine judgment in trading down to acquire more selections. However, beginning with the fourth round, when he selected Tretter, who probably would have been there in the 6th, TT missed out on many objectively better players. That’s why I would grade this year’s draft a “B-.”

                I hope that all of the players selected, the very good and the not-so-good, have outstanding careers with the Packers. It certainly would be nice to win the Super Bowl more than once every fifteen years or so. But maybe that’s what its all about — parity. Keeping fan interest alive in all of the markets so that the TV dollars and other revenue continue to pour in.

          2. Well said OPPY. I can guarantee you that NFL teams & execs have no time at all to read the stuff most of us write, other than when they R looking for comic relief.
            Pigskin Paul

  8. Very entertaining read, good review of each pick. If either of those OL picks pan out, this will be a very successful draft.

      1. An editor would be wonderful, and a new pair of eyes to replace my old worn out ones. And while we’re at it, a web designer that works for free.
        Pigskin Paul

        1. Just curious, PP, but you gave this year’s draft an overall grade of “B+.” Are there any specific players who could have been selected at the time the Packers were making a selection that, your opinion, would have elevated your grade to “A+”?

  9. PP, can you post your prospect ranking board? I checked your site and saw your top 100, but in your article you mention you have a top 300, and then a list of other players. I am doing a comparison of rankings from across the web and would like to include yours if possible. Thanks.

Comments are closed.