Packers 2010 Yearbook Awards: Player Most Likely to Become a Starter After Being a Backup Last Year All Green Bay Packers All the Time

Green Bay Packer Most Likely to become a starter after being a backup last year

(Be sure to place your vote in the poll below.)

Adam: Mike Neal – Neal wins this one, mainly because if he doesn’t the Packers will be in trouble up front.

Al: Mike Neal –  Neal was coming on strong in full beast mode when he went down for the season. I remember Washington coach Mike Shanahan remarking how good the Packers’ DL was after the Washington game and Neal was a big factor that game.

Chad: Mike Neal – You know it’s a good sign when there aren’t too many options for this category. How many starters are actually leaving, even potentially, next season? The only ones I can think of are Cullen Jenkins, Daryn Colledge, Mark Tauscher, Nick Barnett, Brandon Jackson, and James Jones (if you can count him as a starter). From that list, the only positions where a replacement starter wasn’t already seeing action are at defensive end and left guard. That being the case, I’m going to have to go with Mike Neal. His only real competition is C.J. Wilson; meanwhile, the left guard position is WIDE open right now.

Kris: Mike Neal – With Jenkings likely headed out the door in free agency, now is the time for Mike Neal to show us what he’s got.  He started showing flashes before his 2010 season came to a screeching halt due to injury, but the man definitely seems ready to stake his claim on a starting position for 2011.

Thomas: T.J. Lang – If anything T.J. Lang proved in 2009 that he can play in the NFL, whether he ends up being a backup or a starter in the future has yet to be decided but he definitely belongs in the NFL.  That can’t be said with any of the other potential starting linemen.  In my opinion Lang gets the first shot at left guard should Daryn Colledge leave.

Zach: Neal – With Cullen Jenkins on his way out, Neal should be a starter at defensive end. He’ll first need to beat out Howard Green, who played well down the stretch and applied the pressure that caused Nick Collins’ pick-six in the Super Bowl. But if Neal is healthy, and plays anywhere near the level he showed to begin his rookie season, it’s his job to lose.




Follow Jersey Al:

                    Add to Circleson Google+

Jersey Al Bracco is the founder and editor of, and the co-founder of Packers Talk Radio Network. He can be heard as one of the Co-Hosts on Cheesehead Radio and is the Green Bay Packers Draft Analyst for


15 thoughts on “Packers 2010 Yearbook Awards: Player Most Likely to Become a Starter After Being a Backup Last Year

  1. Logic says it should be Neal. However, me being me, I’m with Thomas it’s going to be TJ. I’m hoping that MM kicks Campen in the butt and forces him to make that change. Nothing against College but this would be his 6th season. Has anyone noticed any improvement, ever?

  2. Since everything we worried about with Ted Thompson is now moot (Yay Ted!) I am going out on a limb and declaring that the one blemish on Ted’s record will make a dramatic comeback this year and Justin Harrell will be the man to make the jump into the starting lineup with his stellar play and his new found dependability . . . oh yes and world peace.

      1. Practically non-existent. But I also didn’t think that half-way through the season last year we would win the Super Bowl so I’m going for broke!

        1. I just hope Harell does not fool TT and the coaching staff into thinking that he is healthy and finally able to contribute. That would mean that a young player with potential like Lawrence Guy or Jarius Wynn would get cut and we will be stuck with Harrell on IR by week 2. A lineman with a bad back is pretty much like having a one armed WR.

    1. I didn’t do the poll, but I don’t really consider Jordy Nelson as a “back-up.” Yes, Jennings and Driver are considered the primary receivers, but Nelson is a big part of the offense already. Just look at his performances in the Atlanta game and SB.

      I guess it’s a matter of what you consider a “backup” to be.

      1. Using that logic it makes sense. Still, according to, he was not a starter on the depth chart.

        1. I don’t think that “non-starter” necessarily implies “backup.” I know we’re picking nits here, but with the number of personnel packages on both the offense and defense, I’d consider a “backup” as someone who fills in primarily for injured players (e.g.: Lang). A “non-starter” would be someone who gets a lot of playing time, but isn’t the first guy in (e.g.: Shields).

          1. I’ve posted this before… Using those definitions, do the Packers have the most non-starters in the NFL?

  3. TJ Lang gets my backing.
    Nelson doesn’t need to get votes…he will be the #2 at the start when DD shows he cannot maintain the level needed and gets the nod over Jones for being the more sure handed,more diverse in scheme ability and team oriented player.

Comments are closed.