• wendall

    Could be that Tolzien did not have enough time in the system last year to do better. This year he is obviously better with much better discion making skills. He was better last year, just did not know the system.

  • montana83

    This will probably be the coaches and TT biggest decision. Don’t be surprised if they let Flynn go due to not wanting to lose a player at another position to another team who they believe is more valuable..
    I am guessing they will think that Flynn won’t be signed by another team so let him go and resign him on the PS.
    Who knows. Find out soon enough.

    • marpag

      Don’t think Flynn is eligible for the PS.

      • marpag

        Oh, and I would take Tolzien anyway.

        In my mind it’s not so much a question of who is better, Flynn or Tolzien? You could make an argument for either, and they are close enough that it probably doesn’t make much difference.

        The bigger question is, “Do you tie up a roster spot with a third QB and let some other player go?”

  • billy

    So Flynns the backup…great, just don’t ask him to scramble, throw deep or try to throw a corner fade in the end zone cuz the guy who became a multi millionaire by playing well in one game can’t do it….hopefully neither one will have to ever play unless its a blowout…

  • turophile

    The problem last year was in not keeping either backup after TC, so they were scrambling for any scrub and no time to learn the complex system. The Packers do not have to keep three guys at QB. Tolzein has thoroughly outplayed Flynn in preseason. He should be QB2. I’d have cut Flynn and Goodson, hoped Goodson cleared waivers for the PS, and kept Banjo and Rolle instead. Flynn would then be a FA who would likely still be available if needed, later in the season.

Back to top
mobile desktop