The Cast and Characters of the 2012 Packers Secondary
We’ve all sat through a terrible movie before. I’m not talking about a movie where it’s so bad, it’s good. I’m talking about a movie that is just plain bad, even painful.
Watching the Green Bay Packers allow almost 5,000 passing yards last season was like watching a bad movie, for a whopping 17 weeks.
If a director makesÂ a terrible movies, he’ll probably try and make some serious changes so his next movie isn’t as bad. Maybe he’ll bring on actors with more experience or a production staff that has a several good movies under their resume.
Not if the director is Ted Thompson.
The Packers GM looked at his flop of a defense and said, “I’m going to get some guys that have even less experience and are more unproven than they players we had last season.”
Nowhere is that more evident than in the secondary.
Who are these guys?
The Packers first regular season game is only a few days away, but we have little idea what the secondary will look like. We know Tramon Williams will be at corner and Charles Woodson will be at safety in base and slot corner in sub packages. We also know Morgan Burnett will be at safety.
But that’s about all we know. We don’t know who the No. 2 corner will be in base and we have little clue what the sub packages will look like.
The defensive front features high-profile draft picks like Nick Perry and Jerel Worthy to try and save the day. The defensive backfield features a rookie safety from Maine, unproven cornerbacks and, gulp, Jarrett Bush.
In my opinion, who starts in the secondary doesn’t really matter. A lot of who we see on the field on Sunday will depend on matchups.
Nonetheless, it’s nice to know more about the cast and characters that are trying to rescue the Packers secondary. We know about the stars — Woodson, Williams and Burnett have been around for a while.
What about the supporting cast? How might they fit? What are their strengths and weaknesses?
Here’s a quick primer on the Packers who will be battling for time in the defensive backfield, both on Sunday and throughout the season.
If none of these players step up, ThompsonÂ might have another flop on his hands.
CB Jarrett Bush
Bush got first-team reps right away in training camp and appears to have the inside track to start opposite Williams in base.
Pro: Tackling. Fixing last season’s sloppy tackling appears to be a priority for the Packers, and Bush’s physicality is a plus. We’re still not sure how fundamentally sound Bush is as a tackler, but we know he’s not scared of contact and will dive into the action when needed. The attitude and mindset to tackle is there with Bush.
Con:Â Double moves. Bush struggles in pass coverage, which is kind of a big deal when you’re a cornerback. Double movesÂ especiallyÂ give Bush problems. If the Packers lack a pass rush against the 49ers and Bush’s man has time to execute a double move, watch out. It might be a long day for No. 24.
CB Sam Shields
After making the team as an undrafted free agent and playing a leading role in the Packers Super Bowl run in 2010, Shields regressed. There were grumblings that he could be cut, but I never bought those grumblings. There’s no doubt that Shields has a ways to go if he wants to be known as an exciting young player again, though.
Pro:Â Raw talent. Shields has speed and quickness that you can’t teach. He can run with anyone and has the instincts to make a move on the ball if in proper position. He’s only been playing cornerback for a couple of seasons, so perhaps last season was just an obstacle on his continuing learning curve.
Con:Â Physicality. It takes more than speed and quickness to be a good corner in today’s NFL. You need to be able to go up against a bigger WR and knock the ball away. You need to put a hit on a running back if he runs a sweep to your side. You need to mix it up with a bigger TE if a pass is floating across the middle. Those are all things that Shields didn’t do last season and absolutely must do this season if he wants a chance to redeem himself.
CB Davon House
A shoulder injury knocked House down the depth chart just as he appeared to be emerging as the front-runner for the No. 2 corner. House will have to wear a brace on the shoulder this season. We all saw how well playing through a serious injury worked out for Tramon Williams last season.
Pro:Â The size, strength and speed are there. In the limited time he was on the field in the first preseason game against San Diego, he made a couple of nice tackles and defended a few passes. Packers fans on Twitter were even starting to buzz a little bit, then he got hurt.
Con:Â Inexperience. Obviously, the injured shoulder is the main concern, but beyond that, the Packers just don’t know what they have in House. Yes, he looked good against San Diego, but that was the first preseason game and the Packers have Super Bowl aspirations. Is House good enough to be a starting corner on a Super Bowl team?
CB Casey Hayward
The Packers traded up in the second round to get Hayward and probably see him taking over for Woodson one day as the slot corner. Like most of the rookies, Hayward generated a few days worth of buzz in camp, but wasn’t able to sustain it long enough to lock down a starting job.
Â Pro:Â Hayward was a good at everything at Vanderbilt. He could cover, tackle, make plays on the ball and make plays after he picked off a pass. That’s the sort of multi-dimensional defender needed in today’s NFL.
Con:Â It’s the same con with Hayward as it is with all of the Packers untested secondary players: What happens when the game counts? What happens when the ball is in the air and Michael Crabtree shoves you in the back as you go up for it? What happens when throwing yourself at Frank Gore doesn’t work like it did against some college RB? Can you adjust and actually make a good form tackle?
CB Brandian Ross
I scratched my head when Thompson kept Ross on the 53-man roster, but I’m guessing it was as much for his play on special teams as anything.
Pro:Â Playmaking. With a family-night pick-six against Aaron Rodgers and a game-clinching interception against Arizona, Ross has shown playmaking ability. Oh wait, both of those plays happened last preseason. Even though the flashy plays might not have been there this camp, all reports have been good on Ross. Expect him to contribute on special teams.
Con:Â Talent. Ross didn’t make the team last year and flew under the radar this training camp. I’m thinking the Packers probably don’t think all that highly of him as a CB, but like what he can do on special teams.
S Jerron McMillian
In Thursday’s preseason finale, McMillian got the nod at safety in sub packages. Can this kid really go from the University of MaineÂ to making an immediate impact in the NFL?
Pro:Â You want tackling? McMillian can tackle (at least he could at Maine). He plays the run well and looks to deliver a hit whenever possible.
Con:Â Pass coverage. The thought of McMillian trying to cover Vernon Davis (or Brandon Pettigrew or Kyle Rudolph) makes me shudder.
S M.D. Jennings
The Doctor got everyone talking during OTAs and early in camp. But was it a case of malpractice? We’ll see if Jennings’ play makes Packers fans groan as much as that last sentence did.
Pros:Â Pass coverage. All reports indicated that Jennings, a converted corner, was a good pass defender. I didn’t really see it in the preseason, but let’s give him the benefit of the doubt.
Con:Â Size (or lack of it). Our own Thomas Hobbes thinks Jennings is big enough to play safety, but is he really big enough to play safety? He’s not oversized, that’s for sure. And given his size limitations, I was hoping to see a little more in pass coverage out of him this preseason.
S Sean Richardson
Another (somewhat) surprising guy to stick on the 53-man. I’m not sure how much we’ll see of Richardson this season, but the Packers like him as a developmental project.
Pro:Â Raw talent. Richardson overcame a lot to make the team and now has a shot to learn and possibly be in position to contribute next season. Of course, he shouldn’t be counted out as a possible contributor right away given the Packers lack of experience at safety, but I see Richardson more as a project for 2013 and beyond.
Con:Â Second-guessing. If the secondary is a disaster, I could see some fans getting angry at Thompson and pointing at Richardson. The logic being that it might have made more sense to sign a safety with some experience instead of keeping a developmental project on the 53-man roster.â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”